Division II · Peach Belt Conference
Lander University · Rankings
Greenwood, SC · Town · Public · Baccalaureate college · the Bearcats · Website ↗
Built for athletes. The numbers a recruit needs and a coach won't volunteer: roster room, the money behind the program, admissions fit, what a family really pays, campus life and safety.
0
Top-ten finishes
among Division II schools
5
Top 10% finishes
of 64 lists
#12
Best standing
Architecture · Division II
64
Lists ranked on
all built from public data
Standouts
Lists where Lander University sits in the top ten, or top 10%, of Division II schools.
Athletics money
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highest-paid head coaches, women's teams | $93,876 | #27 of 297 | #327 of 1,060 | |
| Highest-paid head coaches, men's teams | $122,053 | #33 of 295 | #366 of 1,054 | |
| Athletics revenue | $13,187,767 | #34 of 297 | #376 of 1,060 | |
| Biggest athletic departments | $12,843,071 | #35 of 297 | #379 of 1,060 | |
| Women's share of athletic aid descriptive | 52% | #59 of 294 | #162 of 662 | |
| Assistant-coach pay, women's teams | $49,836 | #60 of 297 | #363 of 1,058 | |
| Most athletic scholarship money | $3,778,622 | #81 of 295 | #396 of 1,054 | |
| Assistant-coach pay, men's teams | $47,859 | #100 of 295 | #498 of 1,052 | |
| Athletic aid per athlete, women's teams | $7,468 | #120 of 297 | #458 of 1,060 | |
| Spending per athlete | $20,815 | #147 of 297 | #519 of 1,060 | |
| Athletic aid per athlete, men's teams | $4,712 | #199 of 295 | #551 of 1,054 | |
| Biggest recruiting budgets | $27,017 | #223 of 295 | #855 of 1,054 |
Athletic departments
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most varsity athletes descriptive | 617 | #31 of 297 | #144 of 1,063 | |
| Most teams | 17 | #56 of 297 | #325 of 1,063 | |
| Women coaching women's teams | 55% | #73 of 294 | #321 of 1,055 | |
| Where the most students are athletes | 16.8% | #112 of 297 | #399 of 1,060 | |
| Most coaches per athlete | 17.1 | #294 of 297 | #1,057 of 1,060 |
Academics & admissions
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most selective | 68% | #64 of 273 | #329 of 1,049 | |
| Most applications | 5,184 | #104 of 273 | #594 of 1,049 | |
| Highest test scores | 1,060 | #106 of 173 | #634 of 774 | |
| Best graduation rates | 49% | #155 of 299 | #801 of 1,085 | |
| Best first-year retention | 69% | #187 of 299 | #867 of 1,085 | |
| Smallest student–faculty ratios | 17:1 | #210 of 299 | #813 of 1,085 |
Best for a major
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for architecture | 0.0% | #12 of 294 | #170 of 1,068 | |
| Best for mathematics & statistics | 1.9% | #14 of 294 | #182 of 1,068 | |
| Best for business | 29.1% | #36 of 294 | #88 of 1,068 | |
| Best for physical sciences | 2.3% | #38 of 294 | #230 of 1,068 | |
| Best for social sciences | 7.5% | #52 of 294 | #314 of 1,068 | |
| Best for agriculture | 0.0% | #52 of 294 | #187 of 1,068 | |
| Best for history | 1.9% | #65 of 294 | #264 of 1,068 | |
| Best for health professions & nursing | 18.0% | #93 of 294 | #252 of 1,068 | |
| Best for public administration & social work | 2.5% | #102 of 294 | #253 of 1,068 | |
| Best for kinesiology, parks & recreation | 5.6% | #118 of 294 | #284 of 1,068 | |
| Best for english | 1.6% | #120 of 294 | #513 of 1,068 | |
| Best for engineering | 0.0% | #127 of 294 | #576 of 1,068 | |
| Best for education | 7.6% | #129 of 294 | #310 of 1,068 | |
| Best for visual & performing arts | 3.4% | #136 of 294 | #554 of 1,068 | |
| Best for psychology | 6.3% | #171 of 294 | #631 of 1,068 | |
| Best for communication & journalism | 2.0% | #177 of 294 | #678 of 1,068 | |
| Best for computer & information sciences | 2.5% | #182 of 294 | #702 of 1,068 | |
| Best for criminal justice & protective services | 0.0% | #220 of 294 | #589 of 1,068 | |
| Best for biological sciences | 3.4% | #224 of 294 | #875 of 1,068 |
Cost & value
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biggest discount from the sticker | 61% | #88 of 293 | #362 of 1,064 | |
| Lowest net price | $14,657 | #96 of 299 | #234 of 1,081 | |
| Cheapest room and board | $10,700 | #103 of 293 | #205 of 1,063 | |
| Lowest net price for families under $30k | $11,868 | #115 of 298 | #381 of 1,072 | |
| Lowest sticker price | $37,670 | #119 of 293 | #244 of 1,064 | |
| Highest sticker price descriptive | $37,670 | #175 of 293 | #821 of 1,064 | |
| Most expensive room and board descriptive | $10,700 | #191 of 293 | #859 of 1,063 |
Campus & place
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highest share of women descriptive | 69% | #26 of 299 | #82 of 1,086 | |
| Most in-state first-years descriptive | 87% | #68 of 299 | #215 of 1,085 | |
| Most international first-years descriptive | 3% | #88 of 299 | #348 of 1,085 | |
| Most NCAA neighbours descriptive | 6 | #106 of 299 | #558 of 1,086 | |
| Biggest campuses descriptive | 3,669 | #113 of 299 | #502 of 1,086 | |
| Most remote campuses descriptive | 16 mi | #142 of 299 | #376 of 1,086 | |
| Most diverse student bodies | 52 | #152 of 292 | #575 of 1,073 | |
| Biggest transfer intakes descriptive | 7.2% | #162 of 299 | #396 of 1,079 | |
| Smallest campuses descriptive | 3,669 | #187 of 299 | #584 of 1,085 | |
| Most out-of-state first-years descriptive | 10% | #227 of 299 | #856 of 1,085 | |
| Highest share of men descriptive | 31% | #267 of 299 | #989 of 1,086 |
Campus safety
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highest violent-offence rates descriptive | 0.84 | #88 of 223 | #421 of 813 | |
| Lowest property-offence rates | 0.38 | #94 of 223 | #277 of 813 | |
| Lowest violent-offence rates | 0.84 | #133 of 223 | #384 of 813 |
Trivia
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longest-standing NCAA members | 1991 | #151 of 300 | #788 of 1,083 |
Teams among their peers
Each team's place among Division II programs in its sport — budget, spend per roster spot, roster size and APR.
| Team | Budget | Per player | Roster | APR | Rankings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women's Soccer · 256 peers | #66 of 256 | #72 of 256 | #87 of 256 | — | Women's Soccer lists |
| Baseball · 247 peers | #17 of 247 | #123 of 247 | #12 of 247 | — | Baseball lists |
| Men's Basketball · 293 peers | #64 of 293 | #75 of 293 | #116 of 293 | — | Men's Basketball lists |
| Women's Basketball · 294 peers | #87 of 294 | #138 of 294 | #58 of 294 | — | Women's Basketball lists |
| Field Hockey · 32 peers | #7 of 32 | #1 of 32 | #32 of 32 | — | Field Hockey lists |
| Men's Golf · 195 peers | #8 of 195 | #32 of 195 | #26 of 195 | — | Men's Golf lists |
| Women's Golf · 183 peers | #31 of 183 | #74 of 183 | #14 of 183 | — | Women's Golf lists |
| Men's Lacrosse · 78 peers | #7 of 78 | #20 of 78 | #14 of 78 | — | Men's Lacrosse lists |
| Women's Lacrosse · 111 peers | #14 of 111 | #12 of 111 | #49 of 111 | — | Women's Lacrosse lists |
| Men's Soccer · 199 peers | #26 of 199 | #95 of 199 | #16 of 199 | — | Men's Soccer lists |
| Softball · 269 peers | #35 of 269 | #66 of 269 | #50 of 269 | — | Softball lists |
| Men's Tennis · 131 peers | #9 of 131 | #29 of 131 | #14 of 131 | — | Men's Tennis lists |
| Women's Tennis · 178 peers | #20 of 178 | #38 of 178 | #33 of 178 | — | Women's Tennis lists |
| Men's Track & Field · 229 peers | #110 of 229 | #156 of 229 | #63 of 229 | — | Men's Track & Field lists |
| Women's Track & Field · 255 peers | #117 of 255 | #211 of 255 | #46 of 255 | — | Women's Track & Field lists |
| Women's Volleyball · 283 peers | #77 of 283 | #83 of 283 | #113 of 283 | — | Women's Volleyball lists |
| Men's Wrestling · 72 peers | #3 of 72 | #11 of 72 | #9 of 72 | — | Men's Wrestling lists |
Ranks come from the site's public rankings, computed at the last import; ties share a rank. "Descriptive" lists (size, setting, who comes from where) are facts, not achievements. All rankings.
Put Lander University on a target list and email its coaching staffs from Gmail.Start your board