Division II · South Atlantic Conference
Mars Hill University · Rankings
Mars Hill, NC · Rural · Private · Baccalaureate college · the Lions · Website ↗
Built for athletes. The numbers a recruit needs and a coach won't volunteer: roster room, the money behind the program, admissions fit, what a family really pays, campus life and safety.
0
Top-ten finishes
among Division II schools
6
Top 10% finishes
of 60 lists
#12
Best standing
Athlete share · Division II
60
Lists ranked on
all built from public data
Standouts
Lists where Mars Hill University sits in the top ten, or top 10%, of Division II schools.
#12Where the most students are athletesof 297 in Division II · #23 nationally60.5%#12Best for architectureof 294 in Division II · #170 nationally0.0%#15Smallest student–faculty ratiosof 299 in Division II · #132 nationally10:1#24Best for public administration & social workof 294 in Division II · #54 nationally6.1%
Athletics money
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Most athletic scholarship money | $4,695,369 | #39 of 295 | #330 of 1,054 | |
| Athletic aid per athlete, men's teams | $6,805 | #106 of 295 | #447 of 1,054 | |
| Biggest athletic departments | $9,070,967 | #109 of 297 | #489 of 1,060 | |
| Athletics revenue | $9,070,967 | #116 of 297 | #498 of 1,060 | |
| Athletic aid per athlete, women's teams | $6,654 | #147 of 297 | #494 of 1,060 | |
| Biggest recruiting budgets | $50,839 | #149 of 295 | #693 of 1,054 | |
| Assistant-coach pay, men's teams | $32,674 | #219 of 295 | #810 of 1,052 | |
| Spending per athlete | $14,969 | #244 of 297 | #641 of 1,060 | |
| Highest-paid head coaches, women's teams | $47,257 | #251 of 297 | #925 of 1,060 | |
| Assistant-coach pay, women's teams | $23,554 | #258 of 297 | #900 of 1,058 | |
| Highest-paid head coaches, men's teams | $52,980 | #259 of 295 | #923 of 1,054 | |
| Women's share of athletic aid descriptive | 32% | #276 of 294 | #639 of 662 |
Athletic departments
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Where the most students are athletes | 60.5% | #12 of 297 | #23 of 1,060 | |
| Most varsity athletes descriptive | 606 | #33 of 297 | #153 of 1,063 | |
| Most teams | 18 | #35 of 297 | #232 of 1,063 | |
| Women coaching women's teams | 55% | #73 of 294 | #321 of 1,055 | |
| Most coaches per athlete | 16.4 | #290 of 297 | #1,053 of 1,060 |
Academics & admissions
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smallest student–faculty ratios | 10:1 | #15 of 299 | #132 of 1,085 | |
| Most selective | 78% | #117 of 273 | #519 of 1,049 | |
| Best graduation rates | 42% | #219 of 299 | #944 of 1,085 | |
| Most applications | 1,393 | #242 of 273 | #975 of 1,049 | |
| Best first-year retention | 61% | #263 of 299 | #1,020 of 1,085 |
Best for a major
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for architecture | 0.0% | #12 of 294 | #170 of 1,068 | |
| Best for public administration & social work | 6.1% | #24 of 294 | #54 of 1,068 | |
| Best for biological sciences | 10.8% | #32 of 294 | #218 of 1,068 | |
| Best for criminal justice & protective services | 8.5% | #36 of 294 | #90 of 1,068 | |
| Best for agriculture | 0.0% | #52 of 294 | #187 of 1,068 | |
| Best for kinesiology, parks & recreation | 8.0% | #63 of 294 | #164 of 1,068 | |
| Best for visual & performing arts | 5.6% | #64 of 294 | #284 of 1,068 | |
| Best for history | 1.9% | #65 of 294 | #264 of 1,068 | |
| Best for business | 21.6% | #89 of 294 | #285 of 1,068 | |
| Best for english | 1.9% | #94 of 294 | #415 of 1,068 | |
| Best for psychology | 8.5% | #100 of 294 | #364 of 1,068 | |
| Best for health professions & nursing | 16.0% | #107 of 294 | #292 of 1,068 | |
| Best for engineering | 0.0% | #127 of 294 | #576 of 1,068 | |
| Best for social sciences | 2.8% | #156 of 294 | #719 of 1,068 | |
| Best for computer & information sciences | 2.8% | #166 of 294 | #644 of 1,068 | |
| Best for education | 4.7% | #181 of 294 | #513 of 1,068 | |
| Best for physical sciences | 0.5% | #181 of 294 | #769 of 1,068 | |
| Best for mathematics & statistics | 0.0% | #237 of 294 | #941 of 1,068 | |
| Best for communication & journalism | 0.0% | #259 of 294 | #892 of 1,068 |
Cost & value
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheapest room and board | $10,228 | #79 of 293 | #145 of 1,063 | |
| Highest sticker price descriptive | $50,498 | #81 of 293 | #523 of 1,064 | |
| Biggest discount from the sticker | 61% | #88 of 293 | #362 of 1,064 | |
| Lowest net price | $19,842 | #184 of 299 | #497 of 1,081 | |
| Lowest net price for families under $30k | $17,372 | #205 of 298 | #723 of 1,072 | |
| Lowest sticker price | $50,498 | #213 of 293 | #542 of 1,064 | |
| Most expensive room and board descriptive | $10,228 | #215 of 293 | #919 of 1,063 |
Campus & place
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smallest campuses descriptive | 1,002 | #29 of 299 | #104 of 1,085 | |
| Highest share of men descriptive | 52% | #29 of 299 | #115 of 1,086 | |
| Most out-of-state first-years descriptive | 36% | #75 of 299 | #381 of 1,085 | |
| Most NCAA neighbours descriptive | 6 | #106 of 299 | #558 of 1,086 | |
| Most international first-years descriptive | 2% | #120 of 299 | #455 of 1,085 | |
| Most diverse student bodies | 54 | #140 of 292 | #527 of 1,073 | |
| Most remote campuses descriptive | 15 mi | #147 of 299 | #406 of 1,086 | |
| Biggest transfer intakes descriptive | 6.7% | #178 of 299 | #445 of 1,079 | |
| Most in-state first-years descriptive | 54% | #235 of 299 | #758 of 1,085 | |
| Highest share of women descriptive | 48% | #269 of 299 | #956 of 1,086 | |
| Biggest campuses descriptive | 1,002 | #271 of 299 | #982 of 1,086 |
Trivia
| Ranking | Value | Division II rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longest-standing NCAA members | 1991 | #151 of 300 | #788 of 1,083 |
Teams among their peers
Each team's place among Division II programs in its sport — budget, spend per roster spot, roster size and APR.
| Team | Budget | Per player | Roster | APR | Rankings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women's Soccer · 256 peers | #180 of 256 | #236 of 256 | #15 of 256 | — | Women's Soccer lists |
| Baseball · 247 peers | #59 of 247 | #129 of 247 | #30 of 247 | — | Baseball lists |
| Men's Basketball · 293 peers | #239 of 293 | #219 of 293 | #73 of 293 | — | Men's Basketball lists |
| Women's Basketball · 294 peers | #245 of 294 | #222 of 294 | #112 of 294 | — | Women's Basketball lists |
| Football · 158 peers | #67 of 158 | #98 of 158 | #23 of 158 | — | Football lists |
| Men's Golf · 195 peers | #172 of 195 | #172 of 195 | #62 of 195 | — | Men's Golf lists |
| Women's Golf · 183 peers | #155 of 183 | #153 of 183 | #81 of 183 | — | Women's Golf lists |
| Men's Lacrosse · 78 peers | #59 of 78 | #42 of 78 | #59 of 78 | — | Men's Lacrosse lists |
| Women's Lacrosse · 111 peers | #86 of 111 | #92 of 111 | #54 of 111 | — | Women's Lacrosse lists |
| Men's Soccer · 199 peers | #28 of 199 | #137 of 199 | #8 of 199 | — | Men's Soccer lists |
| Softball · 269 peers | #175 of 269 | #187 of 269 | #84 of 269 | — | Softball lists |
| Men's Swimming & Diving · 71 peers | #48 of 71 | #31 of 71 | #58 of 71 | — | Men's Swimming & Diving lists |
| Women's Swimming & Diving · 91 peers | #77 of 91 | #65 of 91 | #78 of 91 | — | Women's Swimming & Diving lists |
| Men's Tennis · 131 peers | #105 of 131 | #105 of 131 | #61 of 131 | — | Men's Tennis lists |
| Women's Tennis · 178 peers | #165 of 178 | #146 of 178 | #157 of 178 | — | Women's Tennis lists |
| Men's Track & Field · 229 peers | #117 of 229 | #154 of 229 | #78 of 229 | — | Men's Track & Field lists |
| Women's Track & Field · 255 peers | #156 of 255 | #190 of 255 | #93 of 255 | — | Women's Track & Field lists |
| Women's Volleyball · 283 peers | #177 of 283 | #188 of 283 | #61 of 283 | — | Women's Volleyball lists |
Ranks come from the site's public rankings, computed at the last import; ties share a rank. "Descriptive" lists (size, setting, who comes from where) are facts, not achievements. All rankings.
Put Mars Hill University on a target list and email its coaching staffs from Gmail.Start your board