Division III · St. Louis Intercollegiate Athletic Conference
Mississippi University for Women · Rankings
Columbus, MS · Town · Public · Master's university · the Owls · Website ↗
Built for athletes. The numbers a recruit needs and a coach won't volunteer: roster room, the money behind the program, admissions fit, what a family really pays, campus life and safety.
4
Top-ten finishes
among Division III schools
12
Top 10% finishes
of 62 lists
#2
Best standing
Lowest sticker · Division III
62
Lists ranked on
all built from public data
Standouts
Lists where Mississippi University for Women sits in the top ten, or top 10%, of Division III schools.
#2Lowest sticker priceof 412 in Division III · #10 nationally$22,879#4Best for health professions & nursingof 410 in Division III · #8 nationally60.4%#10Cheapest room and boardof 411 in Division III · #37 nationally$8,387#14Athletic aid per athlete, men's teamsof 399 in Division III · #660 nationally$0#15Athletic aid per athlete, women's teamsof 403 in Division III · #663 nationally$0#17Most athletic scholarship moneyof 399 in Division III · #663 nationally$0#19Lowest net priceof 419 in Division III · #135 nationally$12,617#35Best for architectureof 410 in Division III · #170 nationally0.0%#38Best for agricultureof 410 in Division III · #187 nationally0.0%#25Lowest violent-offence ratesof 235 in Division III · #58 nationally0.15
Athletics money
| Ranking | Value | Division III rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Athletic aid per athlete, men's teams | $0 | #14 of 399 | #660 of 1,054 | |
| Athletic aid per athlete, women's teams | $0 | #15 of 403 | #663 of 1,060 | |
| Most athletic scholarship money | $0 | #17 of 399 | #663 of 1,054 | |
| Assistant-coach pay, women's teams | $45,003 | #68 of 401 | #447 of 1,058 | |
| Spending per athlete | $10,505 | #113 of 403 | #761 of 1,060 | |
| Assistant-coach pay, men's teams | $42,892 | #114 of 397 | #601 of 1,052 | |
| Athletics revenue | $2,655,514 | #301 of 403 | #953 of 1,060 | |
| Biggest athletic departments | $2,426,604 | #320 of 403 | #973 of 1,060 | |
| Biggest recruiting budgets | $11,000 | #338 of 399 | #962 of 1,054 | |
| Highest-paid head coaches, men's teams | $33,522 | #386 of 399 | #1,035 of 1,054 | |
| Highest-paid head coaches, women's teams | $31,596 | #387 of 403 | #1,037 of 1,060 |
Athletic departments
| Ranking | Value | Division III rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women coaching women's teams | 43% | #221 of 401 | #567 of 1,055 | |
| Most coaches per athlete | 8.6 | #284 of 403 | #707 of 1,060 | |
| Where the most students are athletes | 11.6% | #309 of 400 | #515 of 1,060 | |
| Most teams | 13 | #340 of 403 | #714 of 1,063 | |
| Most varsity athletes descriptive | 231 | #356 of 403 | #964 of 1,063 |
Academics & admissions
| Ranking | Value | Division III rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smallest student–faculty ratios | 10:1 | #86 of 420 | #132 of 1,085 | |
| Best first-year retention | 72% | #320 of 420 | #773 of 1,085 | |
| Best graduation rates | 37% | #406 of 420 | #994 of 1,085 | |
| Most applications | 553 | #410 of 417 | #1,039 of 1,049 | |
| Most selective | 100% | #415 of 417 | #1,038 of 1,049 |
Best for a major
| Ranking | Value | Division III rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for health professions & nursing | 60.4% | #4 of 410 | #8 of 1,068 | |
| Best for architecture | 0.0% | #35 of 410 | #170 of 1,068 | |
| Best for agriculture | 0.0% | #38 of 410 | #187 of 1,068 | |
| Best for engineering | 0.0% | #154 of 410 | #576 of 1,068 | |
| Best for kinesiology, parks & recreation | 3.3% | #165 of 410 | #478 of 1,068 | |
| Best for criminal justice & protective services | 0.0% | #168 of 410 | #589 of 1,068 | |
| Best for public administration & social work | 0.0% | #173 of 410 | #602 of 1,068 | |
| Best for business | 15.1% | #221 of 410 | #666 of 1,068 | |
| Best for education | 3.6% | #229 of 410 | #613 of 1,068 | |
| Best for visual & performing arts | 2.8% | #256 of 410 | #646 of 1,068 | |
| Best for communication & journalism | 0.9% | #272 of 410 | #833 of 1,068 | |
| Best for english | 1.4% | #273 of 410 | #597 of 1,068 | |
| Best for mathematics & statistics | 0.5% | #282 of 410 | #685 of 1,068 | |
| Best for history | 0.6% | #291 of 410 | #776 of 1,068 | |
| Best for physical sciences | 0.2% | #310 of 410 | #872 of 1,068 | |
| Best for computer & information sciences | 0.0% | #340 of 410 | #952 of 1,068 | |
| Best for biological sciences | 2.8% | #340 of 410 | #930 of 1,068 | |
| Best for social sciences | 0.9% | #345 of 410 | #929 of 1,068 | |
| Best for psychology | 2.0% | #381 of 410 | #1,010 of 1,068 |
Cost & value
| Ranking | Value | Division III rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest sticker price | $22,879 | #2 of 412 | #10 of 1,064 | |
| Cheapest room and board | $8,387 | #10 of 411 | #37 of 1,063 | |
| Lowest net price | $12,617 | #19 of 419 | #135 of 1,081 | |
| Lowest net price for families under $30k | $11,376 | #90 of 413 | #355 of 1,072 | |
| Biggest discount from the sticker | 45% | #367 of 412 | #927 of 1,064 | |
| Most expensive room and board descriptive | $8,387 | #402 of 411 | #1,027 of 1,063 | |
| Highest sticker price descriptive | $22,879 | #411 of 412 | #1,055 of 1,064 |
Campus & place
| Ranking | Value | Division III rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biggest transfer intakes descriptive | 24.7% | #5 of 414 | #6 of 1,079 | |
| Highest share of women descriptive | 78% | #24 of 421 | #26 of 1,086 | |
| Most remote campuses descriptive | 22 mi | #59 of 421 | #268 of 1,086 | |
| Most in-state first-years descriptive | 74% | #148 of 420 | #461 of 1,085 | |
| Biggest campuses descriptive | 1,995 | #190 of 421 | #732 of 1,086 | |
| Most diverse student bodies | 54 | #200 of 416 | #527 of 1,073 | |
| Smallest campuses descriptive | 1,995 | #230 of 420 | #353 of 1,085 | |
| Most out-of-state first-years descriptive | 26% | #240 of 420 | #538 of 1,085 | |
| Most international first-years descriptive | 0% | #285 of 420 | #830 of 1,085 | |
| Highest share of men descriptive | 22% | #397 of 421 | #1,060 of 1,086 | |
| Most NCAA neighbours descriptive | 1 | #409 of 421 | #933 of 1,086 |
Campus safety
| Ranking | Value | Division III rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest violent-offence rates | 0.15 | #25 of 235 | #58 of 813 | |
| Lowest property-offence rates | 2.13 | #210 of 235 | #700 of 813 | |
| Highest violent-offence rates descriptive | 0.15 | #210 of 235 | #754 of 813 |
Trivia
| Ranking | Value | Division III rank | Percentile | National rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longest-standing NCAA members | 1981 | #236 of 417 | #668 of 1,083 |
Teams among their peers
Each team's place among Division III programs in its sport — budget, spend per roster spot, roster size and APR.
| Team | Budget | Per player | Roster | APR | Rankings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women's Soccer · 400 peers | #253 of 400 | #73 of 400 | #384 of 400 | — | Women's Soccer lists |
| Baseball · 371 peers | #115 of 371 | #33 of 371 | #348 of 371 | — | Baseball lists |
| Men's Basketball · 400 peers | #240 of 400 | #148 of 400 | #352 of 400 | — | Men's Basketball lists |
| Women's Basketball · 401 peers | #214 of 401 | #253 of 401 | #97 of 401 | — | Women's Basketball lists |
| Men's Golf · 282 peers | #68 of 282 | #66 of 282 | #104 of 282 | — | Men's Golf lists |
| Women's Golf · 232 peers | #73 of 232 | #21 of 232 | #193 of 232 | — | Women's Golf lists |
| Men's Soccer · 399 peers | #254 of 399 | #69 of 399 | #396 of 399 | — | Men's Soccer lists |
| Softball · 382 peers | #250 of 382 | #279 of 382 | #121 of 382 | — | Softball lists |
| Men's Tennis · 283 peers | #248 of 283 | #229 of 283 | #232 of 283 | — | Men's Tennis lists |
| Women's Tennis · 306 peers | #263 of 306 | #235 of 306 | #263 of 306 | — | Women's Tennis lists |
| Men's Track & Field · 328 peers | #145 of 328 | #76 of 328 | #201 of 328 | — | Men's Track & Field lists |
| Women's Track & Field · 338 peers | #129 of 338 | #152 of 338 | #136 of 338 | — | Women's Track & Field lists |
Ranks come from the site's public rankings, computed at the last import; ties share a rank. "Descriptive" lists (size, setting, who comes from where) are facts, not achievements. All rankings.
Put Mississippi University for Women on a target list and email its coaching staffs from Gmail.Start your board