Division III · American Southwest Conference
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor Softball
Belton, TX · the Crusaders, The Cru · University of Mary Hardin-Baylor overview
26
Roster
2024–25 season
$237k
Team budget
84th percentile in Division III
$9,117
Per roster spot
median $7,623
2
Coaches
1 head · 1 assistant
95%
Admitted
bottom quarter for selectivity
University of Mary Hardin-Baylor fields a softball team in the American Southwest Conference (NCAA Division III). In 2024–25 the roster carried 26 players, above the median of 21, with 1 head coach and 1 assistant. Team expenses were $237,061, above the median of $162k — $9,117 per roster spot, upper half of Division III softball programs. The school reports no athletic aid for women's teams — Division III programs do not offer athletic scholarships.
Among Division III softball programs
Where this program sits against its 382 peers (percentile; the tick is the median).
#61Team budgetof 382 · Division III#123Spend per playerof 382 · Division III#61Roster sizeof 382 · Division III
Team budgets across the division
this programevery Division III softball program
Roster sizes
this programevery Division III roster
The program
- Roster26 2024–25 season
- Coaching staff1 head, 1 assistant
- Team expenses$237,061 for the year
- Operating expenses$71,845 game-day and travel
- Spend per roster spot$9,117 division median $7,623
- Athletic aid, women's teamsNone school-wide
- Aid per roster spot$0 across women's teams
- Recruiting spend, women's$17,603 school-wide
Coaching staff
| Name | Title | |
|---|---|---|
| Melissa Mojica head coach | Head Coach | not on file |
Put University of Mary Hardin-Baylor on a target list, address the whole staff at once, and send each email yourself from Gmail — nothing goes out without you pressing Send.Start your board
Recruiting timing
- Coaches may first contact youany time
- Your own emailsAny time the rule limits what coaches send back
- High-school softball players338,315 2024-25
- Division III roster spots8,293 382 programs
- Odds of a spot1 in 41 2.5% of high-school players hold a Division III roster spot
General NCAA rule for Division III; the softball recruiting guide has the date for each grad year, the eligibility checklist and what to put in a first email.
About the school
What an athlete asks first — each panel opens the full picture.Campus
Full picture →3,024undergraduates · 3,520 students in all
Women 64% Men 36%
- Setting
- Suburb
- Type
- Private · Doctoral/professional university
- Affiliation
- Baptist
Getting in
Full picture →95%admitted · of 11,407 applicants
SAT middle 50%970 – 1200
ACT middle 50%19 – 26
- Test scores
- Test-optional
- Graduate in 6 yrs
- 53%
Softball
Full picture →26on the roster · 2024–25 season
- Team expenses
- $237,061 $9,118 per roster spot · top quarter of Division III
- Coaches
- 1 head · 1 assistant
- Athletic aid, women's teams
- None
- Recruiting spend, women's
- $17,603
Cost
Full picture →$29,904net price · after grants, aided first-years
Net price by family income
- Tuition & fees
- $33,280
Campus safety
Full picture →1.3violent offences per 1,000 · students a year, 2022–2024
- In residence halls
- 1 burglaries · 9 sex offences over 2022–2024
- Residence-hall fires
- 8 over 2022–2024
Majors
Full picture →30%of bachelor's degrees in health professions & nursing · 23 fields · Bachelor's, Doctorate, Master's
Research University of Mary Hardin-Baylor
School pages built around what an athlete needs to know — the program's money and roster room, admissions fit, what a family really pays, majors, campus life and safety.
Softball program26 on the rosterPeers, percentiles, nearby programs, comparisonsRankingsWhere it standsEvery list this school is on, nationally and in its divisionAdmissions95% admittedSAT/ACT ladders, test policy, graduationCost & aid$29,904 net priceSticker vs net price by family income, athletic aidMajorsHealth professions & nursing · 30%Every field and program with degrees awardedCampusSuburb · 3,024Setting, who is on campus, housing costs, servicesCampus safety1.3 violent / 1,000Three years of reported offences against the divisionAthleticsEvery teamThe whole department: every team, staff and aid
Softball programs within 150 miles
| School | Miles | Roster | Budget | APR | Admitted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Southwestern University (Texas) Division III · Southern Athletic Association | 32 | 25 | $224k | — | 39% | |
| Baylor University Division I · Big 12 Conference | 39 | 27 | $3.2M | 997 | 51% | |
| Concordia University Texas Division III · Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference | 50 | 35 | $155k | — | 91% | |
| University of Texas at Austin Division I · Southeastern Conference | 57 | 20 | $3.6M | 994 | 29% | |
| St. Edward's University Division II · Lone Star Conference | 60 | 22 | $710k | — | 84% | |
| Texas A&M University, College Station Division I · Southeastern Conference | 74 | 31 | $4.5M | 991 | 63% | |
| Texas State University Division I · Pac-12 Conference | 86 | 26 | $1.7M | 988 | 89% | |
| Tarleton State University Division I · United Athletic Conference | 91 | 30 | $1.3M | — | 94% | |
| Howard Payne University Division III · American Southwest Conference | 100 | 22 | $109k | — | 68% | |
| Texas Lutheran University Division III · Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference | 108 | 31 | $437k | — | 95% | |
| Prairie View A&M University Division I · Southwestern Athletic Conf. | 111 | 33 | $484k | 990 | 75% | |
| Sam Houston State University Division I · Conference USA | 116 | 23 | $955k | 985 | 85% |
Other softball programs in the American Southwest Conference
| School | Roster | Budget | Per player | APR | Compare | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| East Texas Baptist University | 24 | $435k | $18,114 | — | vs | |
| University of Mary Hardin-Baylor | 26 | $237k | $9,117 | — | vs | |
| McMurry University | 31 | $235k | $7,571 | — | vs | |
| Hardin-Simmons University | 25 | $209k | $8,370 | — | vs | |
| Schreiner University | 41 | $160k | $3,904 | — | vs | |
| Howard Payne University | 22 | $109k | $4,958 | — | vs |
Every American Southwest Conference softball program · Softball budgets ranked