Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Southern California vs University of Wisconsin-Madison
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Southern California vs University of Wisconsin-Madison

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison
88Roster124
43 overRoom under the D-I cap79 over
8Coaches6
$3,652,298Team budget$3,425,046
$41,503Spend per roster spot$27,621
96thBudget percentile94th
1000APR (multi-year)983
99%Players retained98%
$13,525,051Athletic aid, women's teams$7,924,356
21,023Undergraduates36,797
10%Admitted43%
1440–1550SAT middle 50%1360–1510
92%Graduate in 6 years89%
$90,453Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$58,303
$41,496Net price after grants$14,216
1.57Violent offences per 1,0000.98
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board