Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin
Men's Track & Field · head to head
University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| University of South Carolina, Columbia | University of Texas at Austin | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Roster | 113 |
| 34 over | Room under the D-I cap | 68 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 12 |
| $2,611,514 | Team budget | $3,238,856 |
| $33,057 | Spend per roster spot | $28,662 |
| 90th | Budget percentile | 97th |
| 974 | APR (multi-year) | 978 |
| 98% | Players retained | 98% |
| $6,953,077 | Athletic aid, men's teams | $8,766,679 |
| 28,470 | Undergraduates | 42,444 |
| 61% | Admitted | 29% |
| 1180–1380 | SAT middle 50% | 1230–1490 |
| 78% | Graduate in 6 years | 88% |
| $54,223 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $62,672 |
| $26,068 | Net price after grants | $18,036 |
| 0.61 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.78 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board