Start your board
Programs›Women's Golf›University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin
Women's Golf · head to head

University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of Missouri, ColumbiaUniversity of Texas at Austin
7Roster9
room for 2Room under the D-I capat cap
3Coaches3
$1,216,375Team budget$1,591,440
$173,767Spend per roster spot$176,826
86thBudget percentile94th
992APR (multi-year)992
98%Players retained98%
$5,163,687Athletic aid, women's teams$7,450,570
23,613Undergraduates42,444
77%Admitted29%
1150–1330SAT middle 50%1230–1490
76%Graduate in 6 years88%
$52,480Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$62,672
$20,006Net price after grants$18,036
0.71Violent offences per 1,0000.78
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $473k and the median roster 8.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board