Start your board
Programs›Football›University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin
Football · head to head

University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of Missouri, ColumbiaUniversity of Texas at Austin
122Roster118
17 overRoom under the D-I cap13 over
11Coaches18
$49,316,139Team budget$70,405,628
$404,230Spend per roster spot$596,657
89thBudget percentile95th
973APR (multi-year)974
95%Players retained96%
$6,232,907Athletic aid, men's teams$8,766,679
23,613Undergraduates42,444
77%Admitted29%
1150–1330SAT middle 50%1230–1490
76%Graduate in 6 years88%
$52,480Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$62,672
$20,006Net price after grants$18,036
0.71Violent offences per 1,0000.78
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $9.1M and the median roster 119.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board