Men's Track & Field · head to head
University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Oklahoma
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| University of Missouri, Columbia | University of Oklahoma | |
|---|---|---|
| 131 | Roster | 93 |
| 86 over | Room under the D-I cap | 48 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 7 |
| $2,503,909 | Team budget | $3,595,005 |
| $19,113 | Spend per roster spot | $38,655 |
| 89th | Budget percentile | 99th |
| 956 | APR (multi-year) | 963 |
| 96% | Players retained | 97% |
| $6,232,907 | Athletic aid, men's teams | $10,356,127 |
| 23,613 | Undergraduates | 22,025 |
| 77% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1150–1330 | SAT middle 50% | 1140–1330 |
| 76% | Graduate in 6 years | 75% |
| $52,480 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $47,556 |
| $20,006 | Net price after grants | $19,900 |
| 0.71 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.65 |
| City | Setting | Suburb |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board