Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Washington
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Washington

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Minnesota, Twin CitiesUniversity of Washington
129Roster85
84 overRoom under the D-I cap40 over
9Coaches7
$2,625,082Team budget$3,534,453
$20,349Spend per roster spot$41,581
89thBudget percentile96th
997APR (multi-year)992
100%Players retained98%
$9,264,581Athletic aid, women's teams$7,984,481
39,556Undergraduates39,515
77%Admitted43%
1310–1480SAT middle 50%—
85%Graduate in 6 years84%
$52,780Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$63,906
$16,730Net price after grants$11,023
1.09Violent offences per 1,0000.66
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board