Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Southern California
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Southern California

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Minnesota, Twin CitiesUniversity of Southern California
129Roster88
84 overRoom under the D-I cap43 over
9Coaches8
$2,625,082Team budget$3,652,298
$20,349Spend per roster spot$41,503
89thBudget percentile96th
997APR (multi-year)1000
100%Players retained99%
$9,264,581Athletic aid, women's teams$13,525,051
39,556Undergraduates21,023
77%Admitted10%
1310–1480SAT middle 50%1440–1550
85%Graduate in 6 years92%
$52,780Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$90,453
$16,730Net price after grants$41,496
1.09Violent offences per 1,0001.57
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board