Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Oregon
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Oregon

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Minnesota, Twin CitiesUniversity of Oregon
129Roster123
84 overRoom under the D-I cap78 over
9Coaches9
$2,625,082Team budget$3,880,314
$20,349Spend per roster spot$31,547
89thBudget percentile98th
997APR (multi-year)964
100%Players retained96%
$9,264,581Athletic aid, women's teams$6,692,741
39,556Undergraduates19,963
77%Admitted85%
1310–1480SAT middle 50%1130–1360
85%Graduate in 6 years71%
$52,780Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$63,354
$16,730Net price after grants$23,917
1.09Violent offences per 1,0001.11
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board