Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Minnesota, Twin Cities | University of Nebraska-Lincoln | |
|---|---|---|
| 129 | Roster | 122 |
| 84 over | Room under the D-I cap | 77 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 8 |
| $2,625,082 | Team budget | $3,691,809 |
| $20,349 | Spend per roster spot | $30,260 |
| 89th | Budget percentile | 97th |
| 997 | APR (multi-year) | 985 |
| 100% | Players retained | 99% |
| $9,264,581 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $5,591,586 |
| 39,556 | Undergraduates | 19,338 |
| 77% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1310–1480 | SAT middle 50% | 1090–1330 |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 66% |
| $52,780 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $46,296 |
| $16,730 | Net price after grants | $18,029 |
| 1.09 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.2 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board