Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Michigan vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Michigan vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of MichiganUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities
159Roster129
114 overRoom under the D-I cap84 over
24Coaches9
$3,384,067Team budget$2,625,082
$21,283Spend per roster spot$20,349
93rdBudget percentile89th
989APR (multi-year)997
99%Players retained100%
$13,811,731Athletic aid, women's teams$9,264,581
33,730Undergraduates39,556
18%Admitted77%
1350–1530SAT middle 50%1310–1480
93%Graduate in 6 years85%
$75,626Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$52,780
$19,005Net price after grants$16,730
2.06Violent offences per 1,0001.09
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board