Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of Maryland, College Park vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Maryland, College Park | University of Minnesota, Twin Cities | |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | Roster | 129 |
| 55 over | Room under the D-I cap | 84 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 9 |
| $2,160,267 | Team budget | $2,625,082 |
| $21,602 | Spend per roster spot | $20,349 |
| 84th | Budget percentile | 89th |
| 989 | APR (multi-year) | 997 |
| 99% | Players retained | 100% |
| $8,222,557 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $9,264,581 |
| 30,608 | Undergraduates | 39,556 |
| 45% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1370–1520 | SAT middle 50% | 1310–1480 |
| 88% | Graduate in 6 years | 85% |
| $59,686 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $52,780 |
| $15,833 | Net price after grants | $16,730 |
| 0.86 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.09 |
| Suburb | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board