Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of California, Santa Barbara vs University of San Francisco
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of California, Santa Barbara vs University of San Francisco
Division I · Mountain Pacific Sports Federation - Women's Track, Indoor
| University of California, Santa Barbara | University of San Francisco | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Roster | 87 |
| 10 over | Room under the D-I cap | 42 over |
| 5 | Coaches | 3 |
| $400,473 | Team budget | $1,772,651 |
| $7,281 | Spend per roster spot | $20,375 |
| 13th | Budget percentile | 78th |
| 992 | APR (multi-year) | 986 |
| 100% | Players retained | 99% |
| $3,360,459 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $5,972,003 |
| 23,232 | Undergraduates | 5,729 |
| 28% | Admitted | 51% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | 1210–1390 |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 71% |
| $71,364 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $81,426 |
| $15,283 | Net price after grants | $44,104 |
| 2.14 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.16 |
| Suburb | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board