Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of California, Riverside vs University of San Francisco
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of California, Riverside vs University of San Francisco

Division I · Mountain Pacific Sports Federation - Women's Track, Indoor
University of California, RiversideUniversity of San Francisco
112Roster87
67 overRoom under the D-I cap42 over
5Coaches3
$756,665Team budget$1,772,651
$6,755Spend per roster spot$20,375
38thBudget percentile78th
980APR (multi-year)986
98%Players retained99%
$2,621,353Athletic aid, women's teams$5,972,003
22,646Undergraduates5,729
63%Admitted51%
—SAT middle 50%1210–1390
77%Graduate in 6 years71%
$71,062Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$81,426
$13,533Net price after grants$44,104
0.78Violent offences per 1,0001.16
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board