Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Wisconsin-Madison
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of California, Los Angeles vs University of Wisconsin-Madison
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of California, Los Angeles | University of Wisconsin-Madison | |
|---|---|---|
| 102 | Roster | 124 |
| 57 over | Room under the D-I cap | 79 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 6 |
| $2,732,210 | Team budget | $3,425,046 |
| $26,786 | Spend per roster spot | $27,621 |
| 89th | Budget percentile | 94th |
| 973 | APR (multi-year) | 983 |
| 98% | Players retained | 98% |
| $9,235,885 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $7,924,356 |
| 33,040 | Undergraduates | 36,797 |
| 9% | Admitted | 43% |
| — | SAT middle 50% | 1360–1510 |
| 93% | Graduate in 6 years | 89% |
| $68,808 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $58,303 |
| $15,166 | Net price after grants | $14,216 |
| 2.15 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.98 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board