Programs›Men's Tennis›The University of North Carolina at Greensboro vs University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Men's Tennis · head to head
The University of North Carolina at Greensboro vs University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
Division I · Southern Conference
| The University of North Carolina at Greensboro | University of Tennessee at Chattanooga | |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Roster | 12 |
| room for 2 | Room under the D-I cap | 2 over |
| 3 | Coaches | 1 |
| $245,937 | Team budget | $323,276 |
| $30,742 | Spend per roster spot | $26,939 |
| 14th | Budget percentile | 28th |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 1000 |
| 99% | Players retained | 100% |
| $1,203,599 | Athletic aid, men's teams | $3,263,661 |
| 14,156 | Undergraduates | 9,982 |
| 90% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1100–1280 | SAT middle 50% | 1005–1185 |
| 58% | Graduate in 6 years | 53% |
| $38,059 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $34,610 |
| $10,592 | Net price after grants | $13,801 |
| 1.31 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.91 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $452k and the median roster 10.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board