Programs›Women's Track & Field›Texas A&M University, College Station vs University of Missouri, Columbia
Women's Track & Field · head to head
Texas A&M University, College Station vs University of Missouri, Columbia
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| Texas A&M University, College Station | University of Missouri, Columbia | |
|---|---|---|
| 151 | Roster | 119 |
| 106 over | Room under the D-I cap | 74 over |
| 8 | Coaches | 9 |
| $4,413,405 | Team budget | $2,844,658 |
| $29,227 | Spend per roster spot | $23,904 |
| 99th | Budget percentile | 90th |
| 971 | APR (multi-year) | 996 |
| 97% | Players retained | 99% |
| $5,914,617 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $5,163,687 |
| 59,933 | Undergraduates | 23,613 |
| 63% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1140–1380 | SAT middle 50% | 1150–1330 |
| 84% | Graduate in 6 years | 76% |
| $60,736 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $52,480 |
| $21,610 | Net price after grants | $20,006 |
| 1.74 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.71 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board