Programs›Women's Track & Field›Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Women's Track & Field · head to head
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick | University of Minnesota, Twin Cities | |
|---|---|---|
| 125 | Roster | 129 |
| 80 over | Room under the D-I cap | 84 over |
| 7 | Coaches | 9 |
| $2,443,327 | Team budget | $2,625,082 |
| $19,546 | Spend per roster spot | $20,349 |
| 87th | Budget percentile | 89th |
| 994 | APR (multi-year) | 997 |
| 100% | Players retained | 100% |
| $11,643,557 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $9,264,581 |
| 36,588 | Undergraduates | 39,556 |
| 65% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1270–1480 | SAT middle 50% | 1310–1480 |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 85% |
| $56,479 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $52,780 |
| $19,052 | Net price after grants | $16,730 |
| 0.77 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.09 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board