Football · head to head
Charleston Southern University vs University of Tennessee at Martin
Division I · Ohio Valley Conference
| Charleston Southern University | University of Tennessee at Martin | |
|---|---|---|
| 126 | Roster | 116 |
| 21 over | Room under the D-I cap | 11 over |
| 10 | Coaches | 9 |
| $4,335,079 | Team budget | $3,981,711 |
| $34,405 | Spend per roster spot | $34,325 |
| 18th | Budget percentile | 15th |
| 932 | APR (multi-year) | 937 |
| 95% | Players retained | 93% |
| $4,017,082 | Athletic aid, men's teams | $2,836,492 |
| 2,914 | Undergraduates | 6,234 |
| 76% | Admitted | 87% |
| 950–1160 | SAT middle 50% | 1000–1210 |
| 49% | Graduate in 6 years | 55% |
| $47,220 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $29,628 |
| $21,347 | Net price after grants | $11,151 |
| 0.26 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.84 |
| City | Setting | Town |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $9.1M and the median roster 119.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board