Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| University of South Carolina, Columbia | University of Texas at Austin | |
|---|---|---|
| 160 | Roster | 106 |
| 115 over | Room under the D-I cap | 61 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 12 |
| $4,302,617 | Team budget | $3,474,300 |
| $26,891 | Spend per roster spot | $32,776 |
| 99th | Budget percentile | 95th |
| 982 | APR (multi-year) | 991 |
| 98% | Players retained | 98% |
| $6,806,841 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $7,450,570 |
| 28,470 | Undergraduates | 42,444 |
| 61% | Admitted | 29% |
| 1180–1380 | SAT middle 50% | 1230–1490 |
| 78% | Graduate in 6 years | 88% |
| $54,223 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $62,672 |
| $26,068 | Net price after grants | $18,036 |
| 0.61 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.78 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board