Programs›Women's Cross Country›University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin
Women's Cross Country · head to head
University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| University of South Carolina, Columbia | University of Texas at Austin | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 986 | APR (multi-year) | 994 |
| 99% | Players retained | 99% |
| $6,806,841 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $7,450,570 |
| 28,470 | Undergraduates | 42,444 |
| 61% | Admitted | 29% |
| 1180–1380 | SAT middle 50% | 1230–1490 |
| 78% | Graduate in 6 years | 88% |
| $54,223 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $62,672 |
| $26,068 | Net price after grants | $18,036 |
| 0.61 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.78 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board