Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of South Carolina, ColumbiaUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville
160Roster162
115 overRoom under the D-I cap117 over
9Coaches10
$4,302,617Team budget$4,938,294
$26,891Spend per roster spot$30,483
99thBudget percentile99th
982APR (multi-year)1000
98%Players retained100%
$6,806,841Athletic aid, women's teams$11,447,980
28,470Undergraduates28,883
61%Admitted46%
1180–1380SAT middle 50%1190–1340
78%Graduate in 6 years73%
$54,223Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$52,168
$26,068Net price after grants$20,885
0.61Violent offences per 1,0001.37
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board