Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Men's Track & Field · head to head

University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of South Carolina, ColumbiaUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville
79Roster140
34 overRoom under the D-I cap95 over
9Coaches10
$2,611,514Team budget$5,944,189
$33,057Spend per roster spot$42,458
90thBudget percentile100th
974APR (multi-year)974
98%Players retained97%
$6,953,077Athletic aid, men's teams$12,260,488
28,470Undergraduates28,883
61%Admitted46%
1180–1380SAT middle 50%1190–1340
78%Graduate in 6 years73%
$54,223Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$52,168
$26,068Net price after grants$20,885
0.61Violent offences per 1,0001.37
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board