Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Men's Track & Field · head to head
University of South Carolina, Columbia vs University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| University of South Carolina, Columbia | University of Tennessee, Knoxville | |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | Roster | 140 |
| 34 over | Room under the D-I cap | 95 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 10 |
| $2,611,514 | Team budget | $5,944,189 |
| $33,057 | Spend per roster spot | $42,458 |
| 90th | Budget percentile | 100th |
| 974 | APR (multi-year) | 974 |
| 98% | Players retained | 97% |
| $6,953,077 | Athletic aid, men's teams | $12,260,488 |
| 28,470 | Undergraduates | 28,883 |
| 61% | Admitted | 46% |
| 1180–1380 | SAT middle 50% | 1190–1340 |
| 78% | Graduate in 6 years | 73% |
| $54,223 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $52,168 |
| $26,068 | Net price after grants | $20,885 |
| 0.61 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.37 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board