Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of Oklahoma vs University of South Carolina, Columbia
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| University of Oklahoma | University of South Carolina, Columbia | |
|---|---|---|
| 130 | Roster | 160 |
| 85 over | Room under the D-I cap | 115 over |
| 7 | Coaches | 9 |
| $3,688,810 | Team budget | $4,302,617 |
| $28,375 | Spend per roster spot | $26,891 |
| 97th | Budget percentile | 99th |
| 988 | APR (multi-year) | 982 |
| 98% | Players retained | 98% |
| $9,262,904 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $6,806,841 |
| 22,025 | Undergraduates | 28,470 |
| 77% | Admitted | 61% |
| 1140–1330 | SAT middle 50% | 1180–1380 |
| 75% | Graduate in 6 years | 78% |
| $47,556 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $54,223 |
| $19,900 | Net price after grants | $26,068 |
| 0.65 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.61 |
| Suburb | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board