Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Nebraska-Lincoln vs University of Washington
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Nebraska-Lincoln vs University of Washington

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Nebraska-LincolnUniversity of Washington
122Roster85
77 overRoom under the D-I cap40 over
8Coaches7
$3,691,809Team budget$3,534,453
$30,260Spend per roster spot$41,581
97thBudget percentile96th
985APR (multi-year)992
99%Players retained98%
$5,591,586Athletic aid, women's teams$7,984,481
19,338Undergraduates39,515
77%Admitted43%
1090–1330SAT middle 50%—
66%Graduate in 6 years84%
$46,296Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$63,906
$18,029Net price after grants$11,023
1.2Violent offences per 1,0000.66
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board