Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of Nebraska-Lincoln vs University of Washington
Men's Track & Field · head to head

University of Nebraska-Lincoln vs University of Washington

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Nebraska-LincolnUniversity of Washington
111Roster76
66 overRoom under the D-I cap31 over
8Coaches7
$3,296,910Team budget$2,602,318
$29,701Spend per roster spot$34,241
97thBudget percentile90th
982APR (multi-year)988
98%Players retained99%
$7,103,791Athletic aid, men's teams$10,619,493
19,338Undergraduates39,515
77%Admitted43%
1090–1330SAT middle 50%—
66%Graduate in 6 years84%
$46,296Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$63,906
$18,029Net price after grants$11,023
1.2Violent offences per 1,0000.66
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board