Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Nebraska-Lincoln vs University of Southern California
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Nebraska-Lincoln vs University of Southern California

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Nebraska-LincolnUniversity of Southern California
122Roster88
77 overRoom under the D-I cap43 over
8Coaches8
$3,691,809Team budget$3,652,298
$30,260Spend per roster spot$41,503
97thBudget percentile96th
985APR (multi-year)1000
99%Players retained99%
$5,591,586Athletic aid, women's teams$13,525,051
19,338Undergraduates21,023
77%Admitted10%
1090–1330SAT middle 50%1440–1550
66%Graduate in 6 years92%
$46,296Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$90,453
$18,029Net price after grants$41,496
1.2Violent offences per 1,0001.57
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board