Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of Nebraska-Lincoln vs University of Southern California
Men's Track & Field · head to head

University of Nebraska-Lincoln vs University of Southern California

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Nebraska-LincolnUniversity of Southern California
111Roster82
66 overRoom under the D-I cap37 over
8Coaches8
$3,296,910Team budget$3,046,753
$29,701Spend per roster spot$37,155
97thBudget percentile94th
982APR (multi-year)1000
98%Players retained99%
$7,103,791Athletic aid, men's teams$15,118,920
19,338Undergraduates21,023
77%Admitted10%
1090–1330SAT middle 50%1440–1550
66%Graduate in 6 years92%
$46,296Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$90,453
$18,029Net price after grants$41,496
1.2Violent offences per 1,0001.57
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board