Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Missouri, Columbia vs Vanderbilt University
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Missouri, Columbia vs Vanderbilt University

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of Missouri, ColumbiaVanderbilt University
119Roster113
74 overRoom under the D-I cap68 over
9Coaches7
$2,844,658Team budget$5,080,622
$23,904Spend per roster spot$44,961
90thBudget percentile100th
996APR (multi-year)1000
99%Players retained100%
$5,163,687Athletic aid, women's teams$8,521,844
23,613Undergraduates7,152
77%Admitted6%
1150–1330SAT middle 50%1510–1560
76%Graduate in 6 years93%
$52,480Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$89,590
$20,006Net price after grants$26,689
0.71Violent offences per 1,0004.08
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board