Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Texas at Austin

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of Missouri, ColumbiaUniversity of Texas at Austin
119Roster106
74 overRoom under the D-I cap61 over
9Coaches12
$2,844,658Team budget$3,474,300
$23,904Spend per roster spot$32,776
90thBudget percentile95th
996APR (multi-year)991
99%Players retained98%
$5,163,687Athletic aid, women's teams$7,450,570
23,613Undergraduates42,444
77%Admitted29%
1150–1330SAT middle 50%1230–1490
76%Graduate in 6 years88%
$52,480Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$62,672
$20,006Net price after grants$18,036
0.71Violent offences per 1,0000.78
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board