Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of Missouri, ColumbiaUniversity of Tennessee, Knoxville
119Roster162
74 overRoom under the D-I cap117 over
9Coaches10
$2,844,658Team budget$4,938,294
$23,904Spend per roster spot$30,483
90thBudget percentile99th
996APR (multi-year)1000
99%Players retained100%
$5,163,687Athletic aid, women's teams$11,447,980
23,613Undergraduates28,883
77%Admitted46%
1150–1330SAT middle 50%1190–1340
76%Graduate in 6 years73%
$52,480Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$52,168
$20,006Net price after grants$20,885
0.71Violent offences per 1,0001.37
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board