Football · head to head
University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| University of Missouri, Columbia | University of Tennessee, Knoxville | |
|---|---|---|
| 122 | Roster | 123 |
| 17 over | Room under the D-I cap | 18 over |
| 11 | Coaches | 11 |
| $49,316,139 | Team budget | $61,240,437 |
| $404,230 | Spend per roster spot | $497,889 |
| 89th | Budget percentile | 94th |
| 973 | APR (multi-year) | 967 |
| 95% | Players retained | 97% |
| $6,232,907 | Athletic aid, men's teams | $12,260,488 |
| 23,613 | Undergraduates | 28,883 |
| 77% | Admitted | 46% |
| 1150–1330 | SAT middle 50% | 1190–1340 |
| 76% | Graduate in 6 years | 73% |
| $52,480 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $52,168 |
| $20,006 | Net price after grants | $20,885 |
| 0.71 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.37 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $9.1M and the median roster 119.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board