Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of South Carolina, Columbia
Women's Track & Field · head to head
University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of South Carolina, Columbia
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| University of Missouri, Columbia | University of South Carolina, Columbia | |
|---|---|---|
| 119 | Roster | 160 |
| 74 over | Room under the D-I cap | 115 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 9 |
| $2,844,658 | Team budget | $4,302,617 |
| $23,904 | Spend per roster spot | $26,891 |
| 90th | Budget percentile | 99th |
| 996 | APR (multi-year) | 982 |
| 99% | Players retained | 98% |
| $5,163,687 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $6,806,841 |
| 23,613 | Undergraduates | 28,470 |
| 77% | Admitted | 61% |
| 1150–1330 | SAT middle 50% | 1180–1380 |
| 76% | Graduate in 6 years | 78% |
| $52,480 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $54,223 |
| $20,006 | Net price after grants | $26,068 |
| 0.71 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.61 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board