Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of South Carolina, Columbia
Men's Track & Field · head to head

University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of South Carolina, Columbia

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of Missouri, ColumbiaUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia
131Roster79
86 overRoom under the D-I cap34 over
9Coaches9
$2,503,909Team budget$2,611,514
$19,113Spend per roster spot$33,057
89thBudget percentile90th
956APR (multi-year)974
96%Players retained98%
$6,232,907Athletic aid, men's teams$6,953,077
23,613Undergraduates28,470
77%Admitted61%
1150–1330SAT middle 50%1180–1380
76%Graduate in 6 years78%
$52,480Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$54,223
$20,006Net price after grants$26,068
0.71Violent offences per 1,0000.61
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board