Women's Tennis · head to head
University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Oklahoma
Division I · Southeastern Conference
| University of Missouri, Columbia | University of Oklahoma | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Roster | 11 |
| room for 1 | Room under the D-I cap | 1 over |
| 3 | Coaches | 3 |
| $1,305,524 | Team budget | $2,057,344 |
| $145,058 | Spend per roster spot | $187,031 |
| 86th | Budget percentile | 99th |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 992 |
| 100% | Players retained | 98% |
| $5,163,687 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $9,262,904 |
| 23,613 | Undergraduates | 22,025 |
| 77% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1150–1330 | SAT middle 50% | 1140–1330 |
| 76% | Graduate in 6 years | 75% |
| $52,480 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $47,556 |
| $20,006 | Net price after grants | $19,900 |
| 0.71 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.65 |
| City | Setting | Suburb |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $546k and the median roster 9.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board