Start your board
Programs›Men's Cross Country›University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Oklahoma
Men's Cross Country · head to head

University of Missouri, Columbia vs University of Oklahoma

Division I · Southeastern Conference
University of Missouri, ColumbiaUniversity of Oklahoma
—Roster—
—Room under the D-I cap—
0Coaches0
—Team budget—
—Spend per roster spot—
—Budget percentile—
986APR (multi-year)979
98%Players retained97%
$6,232,907Athletic aid, men's teams$10,356,127
23,613Undergraduates22,025
77%Admitted77%
1150–1330SAT middle 50%1140–1330
76%Graduate in 6 years75%
$52,480Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$47,556
$20,006Net price after grants$19,900
0.71Violent offences per 1,0000.65
CitySettingSuburb

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $166k and the median roster 14.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board