Women's Cross Country · head to head
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Washington
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Minnesota, Twin Cities | University of Washington | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 988 |
| 100% | Players retained | 98% |
| $9,264,581 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $7,984,481 |
| 39,556 | Undergraduates | 39,515 |
| 77% | Admitted | 43% |
| 1310–1480 | SAT middle 50% | — |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 84% |
| $52,780 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $63,906 |
| $16,730 | Net price after grants | $11,023 |
| 1.09 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 0.66 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board