Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Washington
Men's Track & Field · head to head

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Washington

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Minnesota, Twin CitiesUniversity of Washington
56Roster76
11 overRoom under the D-I cap31 over
9Coaches7
$1,889,972Team budget$2,602,318
$33,749Spend per roster spot$34,241
83rdBudget percentile90th
984APR (multi-year)988
98%Players retained99%
$9,757,332Athletic aid, men's teams$10,619,493
39,556Undergraduates39,515
77%Admitted43%
1310–1480SAT middle 50%—
85%Graduate in 6 years84%
$52,780Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$63,906
$16,730Net price after grants$11,023
1.09Violent offences per 1,0000.66
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board