Start your board
Programs›Women's Tennis›University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Southern California
Women's Tennis · head to head

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Southern California

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Minnesota, Twin CitiesUniversity of Southern California
10Roster11
at capRoom under the D-I cap1 over
3Coaches3
$1,290,755Team budget$1,618,915
$129,075Spend per roster spot$147,174
85thBudget percentile92nd
1000APR (multi-year)970
100%Players retained96%
$9,264,581Athletic aid, women's teams$13,525,051
39,556Undergraduates21,023
77%Admitted10%
1310–1480SAT middle 50%1440–1550
85%Graduate in 6 years92%
$52,780Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$90,453
$16,730Net price after grants$41,496
1.09Violent offences per 1,0001.57
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $546k and the median roster 9.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board