Programs›Women's Basketball›University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Southern California
Women's Basketball · head to head
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Southern California
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Minnesota, Twin Cities | University of Southern California | |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Roster | 30 |
| 6 over | Room under the D-I cap | 15 over |
| 6 | Coaches | 6 |
| $6,587,319 | Team budget | $9,610,324 |
| $313,681 | Spend per roster spot | $320,344 |
| 89th | Budget percentile | 98th |
| 995 | APR (multi-year) | 980 |
| 97% | Players retained | 99% |
| $9,264,581 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $13,525,051 |
| 39,556 | Undergraduates | 21,023 |
| 77% | Admitted | 10% |
| 1310–1480 | SAT middle 50% | 1440–1550 |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 92% |
| $52,780 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $90,453 |
| $16,730 | Net price after grants | $41,496 |
| 1.09 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.57 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $2.2M and the median roster 15.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board