Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Southern California
Men's Track & Field · head to head
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Southern California
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Minnesota, Twin Cities | University of Southern California | |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | Roster | 82 |
| 11 over | Room under the D-I cap | 37 over |
| 9 | Coaches | 8 |
| $1,889,972 | Team budget | $3,046,753 |
| $33,749 | Spend per roster spot | $37,155 |
| 83rd | Budget percentile | 94th |
| 984 | APR (multi-year) | 1000 |
| 98% | Players retained | 99% |
| $9,757,332 | Athletic aid, men's teams | $15,118,920 |
| 39,556 | Undergraduates | 21,023 |
| 77% | Admitted | 10% |
| 1310–1480 | SAT middle 50% | 1440–1550 |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 92% |
| $52,780 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $90,453 |
| $16,730 | Net price after grants | $41,496 |
| 1.09 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.57 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board