Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Southern California
Men's Track & Field · head to head

University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Southern California

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of Minnesota, Twin CitiesUniversity of Southern California
56Roster82
11 overRoom under the D-I cap37 over
9Coaches8
$1,889,972Team budget$3,046,753
$33,749Spend per roster spot$37,155
83rdBudget percentile94th
984APR (multi-year)1000
98%Players retained99%
$9,757,332Athletic aid, men's teams$15,118,920
39,556Undergraduates21,023
77%Admitted10%
1310–1480SAT middle 50%1440–1550
85%Graduate in 6 years92%
$52,780Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$90,453
$16,730Net price after grants$41,496
1.09Violent offences per 1,0001.57
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board