Programs›Women's Cross Country›University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Women's Cross Country · head to head
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Minnesota, Twin Cities | University of Nebraska-Lincoln | |
|---|---|---|
| — | Roster | — |
| — | Room under the D-I cap | — |
| 0 | Coaches | 0 |
| — | Team budget | — |
| — | Spend per roster spot | — |
| — | Budget percentile | — |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 979 |
| 100% | Players retained | 99% |
| $9,264,581 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $5,591,586 |
| 39,556 | Undergraduates | 19,338 |
| 77% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1310–1480 | SAT middle 50% | 1090–1330 |
| 85% | Graduate in 6 years | 66% |
| $52,780 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $46,296 |
| $16,730 | Net price after grants | $18,029 |
| 1.09 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.2 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board