Women's Tennis · head to head
University of Michigan vs University of Southern California
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Michigan | University of Southern California | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Roster | 11 |
| room for 1 | Room under the D-I cap | 1 over |
| 4 | Coaches | 3 |
| $1,660,942 | Team budget | $1,618,915 |
| $184,549 | Spend per roster spot | $147,174 |
| 94th | Budget percentile | 92nd |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 970 |
| 100% | Players retained | 96% |
| $13,811,731 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $13,525,051 |
| 33,730 | Undergraduates | 21,023 |
| 18% | Admitted | 10% |
| 1350–1530 | SAT middle 50% | 1440–1550 |
| 93% | Graduate in 6 years | 92% |
| $75,626 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $90,453 |
| $19,005 | Net price after grants | $41,496 |
| 2.06 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.57 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $546k and the median roster 9.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board