Start your board
Programs›Women's Track & Field›University of Michigan vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Women's Track & Field · head to head

University of Michigan vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of MichiganUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln
159Roster122
114 overRoom under the D-I cap77 over
24Coaches8
$3,384,067Team budget$3,691,809
$21,283Spend per roster spot$30,260
93rdBudget percentile97th
989APR (multi-year)985
99%Players retained99%
$13,811,731Athletic aid, women's teams$5,591,586
33,730Undergraduates19,338
18%Admitted77%
1350–1530SAT middle 50%1090–1330
93%Graduate in 6 years66%
$75,626Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$46,296
$19,005Net price after grants$18,029
2.06Violent offences per 1,0001.2
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $939k and the median roster 95.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board