Women's Tennis · head to head
University of Michigan vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Division I · Big Ten Conference
| University of Michigan | University of Nebraska-Lincoln | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Roster | 9 |
| room for 1 | Room under the D-I cap | room for 1 |
| 4 | Coaches | 2 |
| $1,660,942 | Team budget | $1,181,353 |
| $184,549 | Spend per roster spot | $131,261 |
| 94th | Budget percentile | 82nd |
| 1000 | APR (multi-year) | 1000 |
| 100% | Players retained | 100% |
| $13,811,731 | Athletic aid, women's teams | $5,591,586 |
| 33,730 | Undergraduates | 19,338 |
| 18% | Admitted | 77% |
| 1350–1530 | SAT middle 50% | 1090–1330 |
| 93% | Graduate in 6 years | 66% |
| $75,626 | Cost of attendance (out-of-state) | $46,296 |
| $19,005 | Net price after grants | $18,029 |
| 2.06 | Violent offences per 1,000 | 1.2 |
| City | Setting | City |
Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $546k and the median roster 9.
Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board