Start your board
Programs›Men's Track & Field›University of Michigan vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Men's Track & Field · head to head

University of Michigan vs University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of MichiganUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln
137Roster111
92 overRoom under the D-I cap66 over
21Coaches8
$2,952,308Team budget$3,296,910
$21,549Spend per roster spot$29,701
93rdBudget percentile97th
983APR (multi-year)982
98%Players retained98%
$17,359,163Athletic aid, men's teams$7,103,791
33,730Undergraduates19,338
18%Admitted77%
1350–1530SAT middle 50%1090–1330
93%Graduate in 6 years66%
$75,626Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$46,296
$19,005Net price after grants$18,029
2.06Violent offences per 1,0001.2
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $812k and the median roster 91.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board