Start your board
Programs›Women's Cross Country›University of Michigan vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities
Women's Cross Country · head to head

University of Michigan vs University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Division I · Big Ten Conference
University of MichiganUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities
—Roster—
—Room under the D-I cap—
0Coaches0
—Team budget—
—Spend per roster spot—
—Budget percentile—
996APR (multi-year)1000
99%Players retained100%
$13,811,731Athletic aid, women's teams$9,264,581
33,730Undergraduates39,556
18%Admitted77%
1350–1530SAT middle 50%1310–1480
93%Graduate in 6 years85%
$75,626Cost of attendance (out-of-state)$52,780
$19,005Net price after grants$16,730
2.06Violent offences per 1,0001.09
CitySettingCity

Green marks the stronger figure where one is plainly better (bigger budget, higher APR, lower price); size and setting are matters of taste. The Division I median budget is $162k and the median roster 14.

Both staffs' emails, a target list with both schools, and one reviewed email to each from your own Gmail.Start your board